Tuesday, 15 September 2015

Richard Skemp on instrumental vs. relational ways of knowing in mathematics

Write about
·         three things that made you “stop” as you read this piece, and why
·         where you stand on the issue Skemp raises, and why.

When I started reading the article “Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding” by Richard Skemp, the first point which came to my attention was what the word “Faux amis” have to do with mathematics and why he was  translating some French words into English. This was a very good scenario to introduce the topic rather than just giving the definition of relational and instrumental understanding. Also, when I read about the two terms and without reading the article completely, I started thinking about the activity we did yesterday in our Math class. Our first lesson was relational understanding where we had visual understanding of geometry. Moreover, it was surprising to see the important point Skemp made about teachers, “At present most teachers have to learn from their own mistakes”. The teacher is not the only one who will deliver knowledge to the classroom. We all learn from our own mistake and we also learn from students as they may have different thoughts and ideas.
Both methods have advantages and disadvantages but I don’t think that you can avoid one of them. As a future teacher, I will use both methods and it will all depend on the topic I will teach. Mathematics is not only about formulas and problem-solving but the logic behind it and how you can explore your ideas.

No comments:

Post a Comment